Tom Goodkind, President of the UMass Boston Professional Staff Union

My name is Tom Goodkind. I'm the president of the Professional Staff Union at UMass Boston, and I've worked there as the machinist for the sciences for 23 years. My machine shop is in the upper-level garage. In fact, I'm one of the few remaining human beings working in the garage, and if the overdue New England earthquake ever strikes on a work day, I'll be one of the last found. No one understands the need for new buildings better than I do.

I came before the Board in late June-shortly before our contracts expired-to present to you our analysis of the erosion of the employee tuition waiver benefit. As we expected, most Trustees were simply unaware that a critical employee benefit instituted in 1983 had, through years of rising fees and inaction on the Board's part, lost nearly all its value.

Among employee benefits at UMass, the tuition benefit is-or was-unique. It was unique in its direct connection to the educational mission of the institution. It was the one employee benefit which encapsulated those two much-abused concepts:  hope and change. The 1983 Board of Trustees said to its employees:  "Come make a career here, and you can educate yourselves and your families, and raise yourselves up just as all our students strive to do." It was a statement that the University would invest in its employees as the first-not the last-rung of the public higher education ladder, as the foundation stone-not the decorative trim-of the UMass edifice.

Today, UMass employees have seen plenty of change, but have precious little hope.

We understand that the Board has little influence on the size of the state deficit and even less on the circuses in New York and Washington. But the Board and the University President's Office have considerable influence on the Governor and legislature. And above all, you have direct control over the University operating budget and its priorities. Every one of us understands that budgets are all about priorities, and now is the time to prioritize the people who inhabit and maintain UMass's buildings, who deliver the goods to our students, and who introduce those students to the hope and change which our institution at its best represents.

Fully restoring the tuition benefit-and expanding it to include continuing education courses-is entirely within the Board's control. Before June, perhaps the Board was unaware of the unfairness of this benefit's erosion. But today-especially given the rough treatment endured by staff and faculty at the hands of the Patrick administration-there is really no excuse for inaction.

 
Shauna Manning, President of the UMass Boston Classified Staff Union

I am Shauna Manning, the president of the Classified Staff Union at UMass Boston, where I have worked for almost 20 years.  I am also an alumna who would like to see the university once again be a contender for national excellence.

In 1987, U.S. News and World Report named UMB as one of the best and most promising universities in the country.  That year, I decided to transfer from California to Boston to complete my education.  

In 1987, no one had cell phones.  Daytime cross country phone calls were expensive.  I got up at 6:00 am California time to call Boston universities at 9:00 am for information about admissions.  I called Boston University, Northeastern, Boston College, and UMass Boston.  Of all of these institutions, the employees at UMass Boston were by far the most friendly and helpful.  When they heard I was calling from California, they bent over backward to help me.  Each time I called, I had a positive experience.  This phone relationship helped convince me to choose UMB.

Much later, I learned that everyone I had spoken to in 1987 was a Classified Staff employee.  Those excellent frontline representatives are a part of the reason I am standing in front of you today.  The other is the employee tuition and fee waiver, which subsequently prompted me to apply for a job on campus.
You may not realize that today the UMass system's Classified Staff employees still work under the same state job titles that were last updated in 1987-a time before cell phones,  email, and the internet.  You may not know that the state took a five year pay scale in the late 90's and stretched it into 12 steps without adding money.  Now, it takes 14 years for a Classified Staff employee to reach his/her contractual salary. 

Boston is one of the most expensive cities to live in the U.S., but none of our salary increases have kept up with the local inflation rate.  The net result is that each year our salaries decrease.

Employees have told me-ashamed and in tears-that they have had to take Personal days prior to payday because they could not afford to pay for gas and parking to get to work.  A new mailroom employee pays 4.5% of his salary to park here while he works.  Employees have had to decide each month which bill not to pay as they struggle to cover their basic living expenses.

While employed here, I have never seen a contract negotiated on time.  Employees are constantly paid in arrears, and when we finally get that lump sum owed us, we are taxed at 27%.

The result is we are not retaining new employees.  In fact, we are becoming the training ground for higher education in the Boston area.  Evidently, we are doing a very good job, because employees are working 1-3 years here and moving to better paying staff jobs at Harvard, MIT, Boston University, and Northeastern.
In our Facilities area, we have only 2 electricians and no plumbers on campus.  Our last plumber retired in May and our salary scale is so low, we can't attract employees.  

We cannot grow as a university if we are constantly understaffed and training the staff we do have.  We cannot attract and retain talented employees if they can't pay for basic necessities-food, rent, and transportation-on our full time salaries.
How do we solve this problem??  First, we need genuine cost of living increases so we don't actually make less money each year.  Second, we need to increase staffing levels so that the university can handle its own business competently.  And last but not least, we need to move forward expeditiously on getting our job descriptions, titles, and salaries into the 21st century. 

We need you, our Board of Trustees, to make these three issues a priority.  They are crucial to the future of the University.


 
UMASS UNION LEADERS TESTIMONY TO BOARD OF TRUSTEES
September 26, 2008
 
MORE TESTIMONY
HOME